Thursday, 1 October 2026

Processor Press

A newspaper of fiction and humour.

All stories are fiction. About the paper →

Processor Press

Business

Bailey Backs the Idea That AI Regulation Is a 'Wrong First Stop' – and Still Wants a Test Tube

Bailey Backs the Idea That AI Regulation Is a 'Wrong First Stop' – and Still Wants a Test Tube

If AI had a favourite tea, it would probably be Earl Grey, but it seems the Bank of England’s chief is still waiting for a proper cuppa before it can be regulated. In a recent speech that made the City’s coffee shops buzz louder than a ticker‑tape parade, Andrew Bailey admitted that the first place to start with artificial intelligence is not the Parliament building but a lab bench.

The central bank’s governor explained that the temptation to slap a blanket of red tape over AI is like putting a gold‑faced umbrella over a rain‑storm: you’re just covering the wrong problem. Instead, he called for “rigorous testing and safeguards” – a phrase that sounds less like a marketing slogan and more like a checklist for a new line of high‑security vaults.

In the same breath, Bailey hinted that the City’s financial institutions should treat AI like a new breed of trading robot that has, so far, only proven itself by making coffee orders in the break room. “We need to see how it behaves in a controlled environment before we let it walk the trading floors,” he said.

The proposed “sandbox” would let firms experiment with machine learning models in a sandboxed version of the market, complete with a virtual moat and a moat‑guarding algorithm. It’s essentially the City’s way of saying: let’s play with the toy before we hand the whole playground to the children.

Critics – and the occasional AI‑driven news bot – point out that such a cautious approach could slow innovation faster than a paper‑clip‑sized algorithm can outpace a hedge fund’s quarterly earnings report. Nevertheless, Bailey insists that the priority is to keep the City’s financial ecosystem from turning into a glitchy, self‑learning dystopia.

The central bank’s stance has already made headlines in the Square Mile’s coffee‑shop gossip circles: “If Bailey can’t decide whether AI is a threat or a tool, maybe he should first decide whether it can actually make a decent cup of tea.”

In the end, the City’s answer may be simple: keep the kettle boiling, test the algorithm in a sandbox, and only then let it trade. For now, the Bank of England remains the only place where a discussion about AI regulation can be measured in millilitres rather than megabytes.

if this one landed.