Ofcom's Newest Thriller: Meta’s Instagram Instants Under the Microscope
A lone tester in a London office tried Instagram Instants for the first time and, after a bewildering flash of disappearing messages, wondered if the app had consulted a safety manual or a fortune‑telling crystal ball.
Italian Actor Weeps in 1970s PSA That Blamed Us for Litter—Turns Out It Was Keep America Beautiful, Not Soda Giants
A 1970s public‑service ad that showed a Native‑American figure weeping over litter was…
The answer, it seems, is that Meta launched the feature without the thorough risk assessment the Online Safety Act demands, prompting Ofcom to dust off its investigative hat and ask the uncomfortable question: "Did anyone actually think about the risks?"
Regulators, armed with spreadsheets and a healthy dose of scepticism, have begun to poke at the feature’s safety net, discovering more holes than a cheese‑grater at a Swiss fondue party. Meta’s internal white papers, which reportedly read like a pilot’s logbook for a never‑launched spaceship, are now the centrepiece of an endless series of meetings.
Inside Meta’s boardroom, executives are reportedly swapping PowerPoint slides for prayer beads, hoping that a miracle‑like risk‑assessment will materialise before the next deadline. The company’s legal team has been tasked with drafting a new “risk‑assessment‑by‑committee” that, according to insiders, will involve at least three more rounds of coffee and a fresh batch of buzzwords.
Ofcom’s spokesperson, who declined to be named, described the investigation as “a necessary check on whether the safety regime is more myth than method.” The regulator’s tone was as dry as a desert, but the underlying message was clear: you can’t launch a feature that disappears messages without also ensuring it doesn’t disappear common sense.
Meta’s response has been to promise a “comprehensive review” – a phrase that has become the tech industry’s version of “we’ll get back to you after the next meeting”. Meanwhile, the public is left watching a drama that feels part courtroom thriller, part corporate improv.
The saga highlights a growing trend where regulators and tech giants dance around each other in an endless loop of pilots, white papers, and promises of miracles that invariably need another meeting. As the investigation proceeds, the only thing certain is that Instagram Instants will be under a microscope that’s far less instant than the feature itself.
For now, London’s tech desk will keep a close eye on the proceedings, ready to report the next twist in this regulatory rom‑com, where the stakes are safety, the villains are vague risk assessments, and the hero is a very confused regulator armed with a clipboard.
Italian Actor Weeps in 1970s PSA That Blamed Us for Litter—Turns Out It Was Keep America Beautiful, Not Soda Giants
A 1970s public‑service ad that showed a Native‑American figure weeping over litter was actually performed by an Italian actor. The ad wa…